WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Sat, May 18, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 12, Issue 3 (2023)
WJPS 2023, 12(3): 57-63 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dahmardehei M, Moin Ara R, Ahmadabadi H A. Comparison of the Effect of Using Collective Plus Ag Dressing and Vaseline Gauze Dressing in the Donor of Split-Thickness Burn Grafts. WJPS 2023; 12 (3) :57-63
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1204-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1204-en.html
1- 1. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences , Dahmardehei.m@iums.ac.ir
2- 1. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences
2- 1. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (1077 Views)
Background: Skin graft involves removing a part of the skin and using it in another part of the body. One of the most common reasons for using a graft is burns. We aimed to compare the effect of Colactive plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze dressing in donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts of burned patients.
Methods: The present study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the Motahari burn Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 1401. The sampling method was done using Cochran's formula and available patients so 15 people were enrolled. The findings of the study were collected using a researcher-made form.
Results: The average duration of recovery, the amount and intensity of pain, and the amount of itching between the two types of Colative plus Ag plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (P-value<0.05). In addition, the findings showed that the average amount of scar left by the wound in the two types of dressings examined is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P-value > 0.05).
Conclusion: The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze. The use of the Colactive plus Ag will be more effective than Vaseline gauze.
Methods: The present study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the Motahari burn Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 1401. The sampling method was done using Cochran's formula and available patients so 15 people were enrolled. The findings of the study were collected using a researcher-made form.
Results: The average duration of recovery, the amount and intensity of pain, and the amount of itching between the two types of Colative plus Ag plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (P-value<0.05). In addition, the findings showed that the average amount of scar left by the wound in the two types of dressings examined is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P-value > 0.05).
Conclusion: The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze. The use of the Colactive plus Ag will be more effective than Vaseline gauze.
References
1. Poinas A, Perrot P, Lorant J, et al. CICAFAST: Comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20(1):612. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3718-4 [DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3718-4]
2. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the world. Part I: Distribution and risk factors. Burns 2011; 37(7):1087-100. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.06.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2011.06.005]
3. Derwin R, Moore ZE, Webster J. Hydrocolloid dressings for donor sites of split thickness skin grafts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012634.pub2 [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012634.pub2]
4. Ma KI, Du M, Liao M, Chen S, Yin G, Liu Q, Wei Q, Qin G. Evaluation of wound healing effect of punica granatum L Peel extract on deep second-degree burns in rats.
5. Trop J Pharm Res 2015;14(1):73-8. Doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i1.11 [DOI:10.4314/tjpr.v14i1.11]
6. Converse JM, Robb-Smith AH. The healing of surface cutaneous wounds: its analogy with the healing of superficial burns. Ann Surg 1944;120(6):873. [DOI:10.1097/00000658-194412000-00006]
7. Wiechula R. Split thickness skin graft donor sites: post-harvest management. Best Pract 2002;6(1).
8. Davidson A, Jina NH, Marsh C, Then M, Simcock JW. Do functional keratin dressings accelerate epithelialization in human partial thickness wounds? A randomized controlled trial on skin graft donor sites. Eplasty 2013; 13: e45.
9. Akita S, Akino K, Imaizumi T, Tanaka K, Anrako K, Yano H. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split‐thickness skin‐graft donor wound healing. Burns 2006;32(4):447‐51. Doi: 10.1016/j.burns 2005.11.015 [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2005.11.015]
10. Chowdhry SA. Comparison of skin graft donor site management using oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC with absorptive silicone adhesive border and transparent film dressing vs semi-occlusive dressings. Int Wound J 2023; 0(4):1112-7. Doi: 10.1111/iwj.13968. [DOI:10.1111/iwj.13968]
11. Kazanavičius M, Cepas A, Kolaityte V, Simoliuniene R, Rimdeika R. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2017;26(6):281-291. Doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.281. [DOI:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.281]
12. Covalon Colactive-Application-Guide.pdf. Retrieved February 1, 2014 http://www.covalon.com/userFiles/Colactive-Application-Guide.pdf .
13. Salehi H, Momeni M, Ebrahimi M, Fatemi MJ, Rahbar H, Ranjpoor F, Salehi A, Moosavizadeh F. Comparing the effect of colactive plus ag dressing versus nitrofurazone and vaseline gauze dressing in the treatment of second-degree burns. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2018;31(3):204-208.
14. Saberi M, Fatemi M, Soroush M, Masoumi M. Burn Epidemiology in Iran: A Meta-Analysis Study. Iranian Journal of Surgery 2015;24(1):47-61.
15. Uygur F, Evinc R, Ulkur E, Celikoz B. Use of lyophilized bovine collagen for split-thickness skin graft donor site management. Burns 2008;34(7):1011-4. doi: 10.1016/j.burns. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2007.12.007]
16. Konstantinow A, Fischer TV, Ring J. Effectiveness of collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose/silver-containing composite wound dressing for the treatment of medium-depth split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds in multi-morbid patients: a prospective, non-comparative, single-centre study. Int Wound J 2017;14(5):791-800. Doi: 10.1111/iwj.12698. [DOI:10.1111/iwj.12698]
17. Ramesh BA, Jayalakshmi BK, Mohan J. A comparative study of collagen dressing versus petrolatum gauze dressing in reducing pain at the donor area. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2017;10(1):18-21. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_110_16. [DOI:10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_110_16]
18. Halankar P, Gomes DC, Chaudhari C. Collagen dressing in the management of donor site of split thickness skin grafts Bombay Hosp J. Last accessed on. 2017.
19. Horch RE, Stark GB. Comparison of the effect of a collagen dressing and a polyurethane dressing on the healing of split thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1998; 32:407-13. Doi: 10.1080/02844319850158499 [DOI:10.1080/02844319850158499]
20. Still J, Glat P, Silverstein P, Griswold J, Mozingo D. The use of a collagen sponge/living cell composite material to treat donor sites in burn patients. Burns 2003;29(8):837-41. Doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(03)00164-5. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-4179(03)00164-5]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
